| Checklist of the Collembola: Hypogastruridae |
| Genus | Number of species |
|---|---|
| Acherongia | 4 |
| Acherontides | 10 |
| Acherontiella | 20 |
| Acheroxenylla | 3 |
| Austrogastrura | 3 |
| Barbagastrura | 1 |
| Biscoia | 1 |
| Bonetogastrura | 7 |
| Celegastrura | 1 |
| Ceratophysella | 137 |
| Choreutinula | 7 |
| Cosberella | 8 |
| Denigastrura | 1 |
| Ecuadogastrura | 1 |
| Gnathogastrura | 1 |
| Gomphiocephalus | 1 |
| Hypogastrura (Franzura) | 1 |
| Hypogastrura (Hypogastrura) | 169 |
| Hypogastrura | 170 |
| Jacutogastrura | 1 |
| Mesachorutes | 2 |
| Mesogastrura | 5 |
| Microgastrura | 7 |
| Neobeckerella | 1 |
| Octoacanthella | 1 |
| Ongulogastrura | 1 |
| Orogastrura | 7 |
| Parawillemia | 1 |
| Paraxenylla | 10 |
| Pseudacherontides | 9 |
| Schaefferia | 34 |
| Schoettella (Knowltonella) | 1 |
| Schoettella (Schoettella) | 10 |
| Schoettella | 11 |
| Stenogastrura | 1 |
| Tafallia | 2 |
| Taurogastrura | 1 |
| Thibaudylla | 4 |
| Triacanthella | 24 |
| Typhlogastrura | 19 |
| Willemgastrura | 1 |
| Willemia | 46 |
| Xenylla | 136 |
| Xenyllogastrura | 8 |
| Hypogastruridae | 708 |
| Remark by Melville, R.V. & Smith, J.D.D. 1987:23: Neogastruridae Stach, 1949. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Family-Group Names in Zoology. Type genus: Neogastrura Stach, 1949. A junior objective synonym of Hypogastrurinae Börner, 1906, the respective type genera of these two families having the same nominal species as type species. Opinion 435. |
| Remark by Melville, R.V. & Smith, J.D.D. 1987:18: Hypogastrurinae Börner, 1906. Placed on the Official List of Family-Group Names in Zoology. Type genus: Hypogastrura Bourlet, 1839. Opinion 435. |
 |
 |
| Remark by Greenslade, P., Stevens, M.I., Torricelli, G. & D'Haese, C.A. 2011:227: Nonmonophyly of Hypogastruridae is consistent with the results of D'Haese (2002). |
| Remark by Janssens, F. 2012.11.15: To partially resolve the paraphyly of the Hypogastruridae (see Greenslade & al., 2011), we tentatively propose to restore the Poduroidea as sister-group of the Neanuroidea and as follows = ((Podura+(Biscoia+Microgastrura))+(Paraxenylla+Xenylla)). Note: this is not yet reflected in the current taxonomic hierarchy. |
 |
| Remark by D'Haese, C.A. 2002:1149: Triacanthella is more closely related to Odontellidae and Onychiuridae [then to Hypogastruridae]. |
 |
| Remark by Janssens, F. 2012.11.15: According to Greenslade & al. (2011), Hypogastruridae is not monophyletic and Triacanthella is the most basic poduromorph genus and sister-group of all other Poduromorpha. Therefore, to partially resolve the paraphyly of the Hypogastruridae, we tentatively propose to place Triacanthella in a monogenic family Triacanthellidae basic to all Poduromorpha. Note: this is not yet reflected in the current taxonomic hierarchy. |
| Remark by Janion, C., D'Haese, C.A. & Deharveng, L. 2012:58: The genus Triacanthella is phyletically isolated among Hypogastruridae both from a morphological and a molecular point of view. |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by ICZN. 2007:403: Placed on the Official List of Names in Zoology. Opinion 435. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by Fjellberg, A. 1998:26: A true Arctic species. Records of 'tullbergi' from Continental Europe refer to other species. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by Gisin, H. 1960:40: Species inquirenda. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by Dányi, L. & Traser, G. 2008:9: As Loksa didn't provide any description or illustration, we have to consider it as nomen nudum. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by ICZN. 2007:156: Placed on the Official List of Names in Zoology. Opinion 1193. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by Thibaud, J.-M., Schulz, H.-J. & da Gama Assalino, M.M. 2004:40,45: Insufficient description. |
| Remark by Dányi, L. & Traser, G. 2008:7: Species inquirenda. Maybe junior synonym of Ceratophysella silvatica Rusek, 1964. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Remark by Bellinger, P.F. & Ellis, W.N. 1976:274: Manuscript name. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| Remark by Thibaud, J.-M., Schulz, H.-J. & da Gama Assalino, M.M. 2004:40,66: Insufficient description. |
 |
 |
 |