Checklist of the Collembola: Hypogastruridae |
Genus | Number of species |
---|---|
Acherongia | 4 |
Acherontides | 12 |
Acherontiella | 20 |
Acheroxenylla | 4 |
Austrogastrura | 3 |
Barbagastrura | 1 |
Biscoia | 1 |
Bonetogastrura | 7 |
Celegastrura | 1 |
Ceratophysella | 142 |
Choreutinula | 7 |
Cosberella | 9 |
Denigastrura | 1 |
Ecuadogastrura | 1 |
Gnathogastrura | 1 |
Gomphiocephalus | 1 |
Hypogastrura (Franzura) | 1 |
Hypogastrura (Hypogastrura) | 174 |
Hypogastrura | 175 |
Jacutogastrura | 1 |
Mesachorutes | 3 |
Mesogastrura | 5 |
Microgastrura | 8 |
Neobeckerella | 1 |
Octoacanthella | 1 |
Ongulogastrura | 1 |
Orogastrura | 8 |
Parawillemia | 1 |
Paraxenylla | 11 |
Pseudacherontides | 8 |
Schaefferia | 37 |
Schoettella (Knowltonella) | 1 |
Schoettella (Schoettella) | 10 |
Schoettella | 11 |
Stenogastrura | 1 |
Tafallia | 2 |
Taurogastrura | 1 |
Thibaudylla | 4 |
Triacanthella | 24 |
Typhlogastrura | 19 |
Willemgastrura | 1 |
Willemia | 48 |
Xenylla | 146 |
Xenyllogastrura | 8 |
Hypogastruridae | 740 |
Remark by Melville, R.V. & Smith, J.D.D. 1987:23: Neogastruridae Stach, 1949. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Family-Group Names in Zoology. Type genus: Neogastrura Stach, 1949. A junior objective synonym of Hypogastrurinae Börner, 1906, the respective type genera of these two families having the same nominal species as type species. Opinion 435. |
Remark by Melville, R.V. & Smith, J.D.D. 1987:18: Hypogastrurinae Börner, 1906. Placed on the Official List of Family-Group Names in Zoology. Type genus: Hypogastrura Bourlet, 1839. Opinion 435. |
![]() |
Remark by Greenslade, P., Stevens, M.I., Torricelli, G. & D'Haese, C.A. 2011:227: Nonmonophyly of Hypogastruridae is consistent with the results of D'Haese (2002). |
Remark by Janssens, F. 2012.11.15: To partially resolve the paraphyly of the Hypogastruridae (see Greenslade & al., 2011), we tentatively propose to restore the Poduroidea as sister-group of the Neanuroidea and as follows = ((Podura+(Biscoia+Microgastrura))+(Paraxenylla+Xenylla)). Note: this is not yet reflected in the current taxonomic hierarchy. |
Remark by D'Haese, C.A. 2002:1149: Triacanthella is more closely related to Odontellidae and Onychiuridae [then to Hypogastruridae]. |
![]() |
Remark by Janssens, F. 2012.11.15: According to Greenslade & al. (2011), Hypogastruridae is not monophyletic and Triacanthella is the most basic poduromorph genus and sister-group of all other Poduromorpha. Therefore, to partially resolve the paraphyly of the Hypogastruridae, we tentatively propose to place Triacanthella in a monogenic family Triacanthellidae basic to all Poduromorpha. Note: this is not yet reflected in the current taxonomic hierarchy. |
Remark by Janion, C., D'Haese, C.A. & Deharveng, L. 2012:58: The genus Triacanthella is phyletically isolated among Hypogastruridae both from a morphological and a molecular point of view. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by ICZN. 2007:403: Placed on the Official List of Names in Zoology. Opinion 435. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by Fjellberg, A. 1998:26: A true Arctic species. Records of 'tullbergi' from Continental Europe refer to other species. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by Gisin, H. 1960:40: Species inquirenda. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by Dányi, L. & Traser, G. 2008:9: As Loksa didn't provide any description or illustration, we have to consider it as nomen nudum. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by ICZN. 2007:156: Placed on the Official List of Names in Zoology. Opinion 1193. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by Thibaud, J.-M., Schulz, H.-J. & da Gama Assalino, M.M. 2004:40,45: Insufficient description. |
Remark by Dányi, L. & Traser, G. 2008:7: Species inquirenda. Maybe junior synonym of Ceratophysella silvatica Rusek, 1964. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Remark by Bellinger, P.F. & Ellis, W.N. 1976:274: Manuscript name. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |